|
All Listening Is Not The Same
During the past 10 years many listening therapies have become
available, and almost universally they claim that they are derived or
based on the theories of the French physician and ear, nose and throat
specialist Dr Alfred Tomatis. At the Spectrum Center ,
we have been employing the Tomatis Method for the past seventeen years;
we find that we are increasingly called upon to explain the differences
between the methods and which is most suitable for different clients.
We hear comments such as other methods take less time, cost less, can
be done at home and sound better, to name the few. In order to
understand and survey some of the strengths and weaknesses of the
various methods and technologies available it is first necessary to
become acquainted with what Tomatis’ theories were and how they are
executed through the technologies of listening therapies.
Theoretical Basis
Tomatis, made his pioneering discovery that “the voice can only produce
the harmonics that the ear is able to perceive.” This identification of
the role that the ear played in vocal production became the first law
of what later came to be called the “Tomatis Effect.” Tomatis also
discovered that if the missing frequencies could be restored to the
ear, through a device he called the Electronic Ear (EE)
they would be returned to the voice and with sufficient training of the
ear and voice through the EE, the changes would become
permanent. These discoveries had important implications for populations
as diverse as singers and children having difficulty in acquiring
language.
Tomatis came to believe that the ear was much more than an organ of
hearing. It is, he maintained in charge of functions including;
energizing and regulating the brains state of alertness and attention;
coordinating posture and movement; and connecting our intentions and
thoughts with our physical and verbal transactions upon our
environment. Tomatis’ life mission eventually became the understanding
of how the ear was physiologically involved in acquiring and
controlling of the voice and language. To this end he invented several
technologies, which could be used to rehabilitate the ear related
functions of alertness, attention, coordination and voice.
Equipment
Initially, Tomatis’ research was to distinguish what differentiated a
good listener from a poor one. He discovered that a good listener is
able to tune into the high frequency sounds that carry the consonants
and consequently the meaning of language, while at the same time
inhibiting the low frequency sounds which interfere with this
perception. Tomatis developed a gating mechanism, which was intended to
train the ear to make fine discriminations of sound in this desired
high frequency range. This electronic gate was the first feature of the
EE and is emulated in all listening programs. The gate on
the EE is activated by the intensity and high frequency content
of the music and voice. The LiFT has the most similar gate. On the
Berard machine and derivatives the gate is activated by the volume and
is played loudly for that reason. On the other methods that are CD
based and hence don’t involve an electronic equivalent of the EE,
the gate is either pre-recorded or digitally approximated.
Another feature that works closely with the gate and is unique to the EE
is called the channels. According to Tomatis, the two middle ear
muscles perform the physical act of focusing the ear. Changing the
channels setting on the EE allows the practitioner to adjust
the tension between the two muscles in the listener’s ear, in
accordance with the profile determined by a listening test. This helps
the listener to physically direct his attention and actually increase
the perception of the incoming sounds that are most meaningful while at
the same time dampening the other competing sounds.
Sound travels to the inner ear through two mechanisms, air conduction
and bone conduction. Sound travels via air through the outer ear to the
middle ear where it is eventually changed to bone conduction and sent
to the inner ear. In bone conduction sound travels through the skull,
bypassing the middle ear, directly to the inner ear.
Bone conduction always travels faster than air conduction. Tomatis
developed the feature on the EE called the Delays that allows
the practitioner to manipulate the time delay between air and bone
conduction, so that when wearing the earphones, bone conduction is
heard first, but then allows an even longer period to become acclimated
to this sound (Bone) before having to analyze it (Air).
Some of the Listening Therapies include bone conduction on their more
advanced models (Samonas and LiFT) but have yet to integrate them with
the other features. No other programs at this time include the delays
featured on the EE.
These features (Channels and Delay) are integrated with the Gate and
work in conjunction with each other. In the Tomatis EE each one
is relegated by a separate dial, which allows the Tomatis practitioner
to create a wide range of separate settings for individual clients
depending upon their ailment specific needs. In skilled hands, the EE
can become an instrument, like a piano, versus a machine like a radio.
In this analogy, the machine, like the radio, does all the work, and
does the same work for everybody who listens to a particular station.
And, of course, everyone can use it and benefit from it, but it does
not require any particular skill. On the other hand, the player on an
instrument such as the piano can create unique results, but it takes
years of practice. Someone trained and experienced on the EE
eventually may become a virtuoso and achieve unique results in the
manner of a customized therapy.
A very important feature on the EE is the ability to
progressively filter out sound frequencies below 9000 hertz. The
Tomatis Method is based on a developmental model of how we all learned
to listen- a process that started in the womb. According to Tomatis,
the fetus hears only high frequencies. The EE is able to
re-create this early listening by progressively filtering out the lower
frequencies on both musical and speech recordings. This gives the ear
an extensive period of high frequency listening that trains it to
accommodate to and focus on those important sounds that lay the
foundation for language and communication. Only the LiFT and TLP
attempt to emulate progressive filtration and they do it to a lesser
extent. The Berard filters are specific to certain frequencies and
address specific sound sensitivities.
Tomatis discovered that the right ear has faster neuron pathways to the
left (language) hemisphere, which ideally, should have a controlling
role in language and motor expression. Experiment and observation will
readily show that when the right ear is not dominant, expression (and
even thinking!) becomes muddled and unfocused. The EE through a
mechanism called the Balance helps us to progressively strengthen the
right ear in its role of audio-vocal dominance. The Berard machines are
similar to the EE in this aspect and LiFT attempts this though
not to the same extent. The other pre-recorded programs give some
emphasis to the Right ear but not progressively.
The microphone along with the gate is the most important feature of the
EE. The microphone completes the loop in the
auditory-vocal re-education process; it is the glue for permanent
change of the Tomatis Effect. In a typical microphone session, the
client hears his own voice through the EE, which is modified
through the gate, channels, delays, filters and balance, so as to
accentuate the high frequencies. With this high frequency feedback the
client is able to incorporate these frequencies into his voice, which
in turn enables the EE to gate better. This becomes the loop of
better perception enabling better vocal production, which in turn
enables even better perception. The active microphone session is only
emphasized in one of the other listening therapy methods, the LiFT.
Training and Programming
The aim of programming is to provide re-education of the ear by
re-enacting the development of listening from the fetal stage (high
frequencies) through birth and then through the development of
language. Through programming we are able to modify the many functions
of the ear. The EE is the instrument. The programmer is the
virtuoso. Tomatis contributed much to our understanding of the normal
and abnormal development of the hearing and listening function in the
human being. Knowing how to design programs and how to adjust them is
the critical human “know how” of the Tomatis Method. This requires
lengthy training of the Tomatis Practitioner, the intensity of which is
not equaled in any of the other currently available methods.
This article is meant to accompany a more in-depth article and
comparison chart that can be found on our website at
spectrumcenter.com. This survey is not an attempt to find fault with
any of the other listening programs as we use many in conjunction with
what we do at the Spectrum Center. This is rather an attempt to
understand what it means to be based on Tomatis’ theories and to answer
the question of what is it we are trying to do and how we are in fact
achieving it. I hope this can open a dialogue so that we all can make
more informed choices.
©2008
Valerie Dejean, OT
.
Certified Tomatis Consultant
|